Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
-
The natural abundance, biodegradability, and low density of plant 昀椀bers, together with biobased epoxy thermoset resin, have driven the increasing popularity of plant 昀椀ber/polymer composites (PFRPs) to wider applications in various industries. However, the striving for biomass-based 昀氀ame retardants (FRs) treatment for PFRPs remained a bottleneck due to polymers’ inherent vulnerability against 昀椀re and the increasing environmental awareness. In this work, a facile two-step aqueous solution coating process was proposed for fabric surface treatment of 昀氀ax fabric using fully biobased phytic acid and chitosan from polysaccharides. The treated 昀氀ax fabric demonstrated self-extinguishing behavior when ignited and showed a decrease in peak heat release rate (PHRR) by 58% under combustion. The laminate produced by this treated 昀氀ax fabric and biobased epoxy resin showed a decrease of PHRR by 36% and an increase of more than 200% for the time of torch 昀椀re burn-through, demonstrating intriguing 昀氀ame retardance brought by only FRs treatment on 昀氀ax fabric reinforcements. Various measurements were done to elaborate on the role of treated 昀氀ax fabric in the 昀氀ame retardancy of polymer composites.more » « lessFree, publicly-accessible full text available January 1, 2026
-
The development of new thermoplastic-based nanocomposites for, as well as using, 3D printing requires extensive experimental testing. One typically goes through many failed, or otherwise sub-optimal, iterations before finding acceptable solutions (e.g. compositions, 3D printing parameters). It is desirable to reduce the number of such iterations as well as exclude failed experiments that often require laborious disassembly and cleaning of the 3D printer. This issue could be addressed if we were able to understand, and ultimately predict ahead of experiments if a given material can be 3D printed successfully. Herein, we report on our investigations into forecasting the printing and resultant properties of polymer nanocomposites while encompassing both material properties and printing parameters, enabling the model to generalize across various thermoplastics and additives. To do so, nanocomposites of two different commercially available bio-based PLAs with varying concentrations of nanoclay (NC) and graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) were prepared using a twin-screw extruder. The thermal and rheological properties of the nanocomposites were analyzed. These materials were printed at varying temperature and flow using a pellet printer. The quality of the printing was evaluated by measuring weight fluctuation, internal diameter of cylindrical specimen, and surface uniformity. The interactions between material properties and printing parameters are complex but captured effectively by a machine learning model, specifically we demonstrate such a predictive model to forecast printability and, printing quality utilizing a Random Forest algorithm. Printability was predicted by developing a classification model with constraints based on the weight fluctuation (W ) of the printed sample w.r.t. the optimal print; defining ‘‘not printable’’ for −1.0 d W < −0.8 and ‘‘printable’’ for W e −0.8. The classification model for predicting printability, performed well with an accuracy of 92.8% and identified flow index and complex viscosity, contributing 52% to the model’s importance. Another model to predict W of the only on successful prints also showed strong performance, emphasizing the importance of viscoelastic properties, thermal stability, and printing temperature. For diameter change (Di), the Random Forest model identified flow consistency index, complex viscosity, and thermal stability as influential parameters, with crystallization enthalpy gaining increased importance, reflecting its role in crystallization and shrinkage. In contrast, the surface roughness average (RA) model had lower performance, yet revealed remarkable insights regarding the feature importance with crystallization enthalpy and complex viscosity being most significant.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
